|
Post by odgreen on Jan 17, 2015 15:22:42 GMT -5
Here is another point to ponder. Mosby points out that in an urban setting, the pistol may become your primary weapon, just because of circumstances. So, if in fact most guys are situated in an urban environment, and not going about openly armed with a long gun is conducive to your overall health and well-being, then maybe we need to explore the handgun, as our primary weapon, right now, versus the rifle sometime in the future. And even a step further, if the handgun isn't viable, what other weapons should we be looking at, such as knife, stick, or other environmental weapons? So if the handgun could become the primary weapon, this has me wondering if we need to put away more handgun ammo? As for environmental weapons, just about anything can be used as a weapon, I think the key is being able to blend into the environment that you are in and not draw attention to yourself. My daily carry everywhere I go is a Glock 17 (sometimes a Glock 19) with 3 mags, 2 knives, Surefire light, Wilderness instructor belt, and long piece of paracord. Sometimes I carry a backup gun, pepper spray. When I have to go to places where I cannot carry a firearm or fly via commercial airlines, I carry a Surefire light, long piece of paracord, Wilderness instructor belt, and a cane (fighting cane). The cane blends into just about any environment and doesn't stick out, as it is not out of norm, the airlines will make you put it in the overhead storage. You can just everywhere with a cane, and it will not be taken away from you as you then become a liability. The cane is a great tool, as it offers the ability of using as stick, but you also have the hook of which gives you more options and uses.
|
|
|
Post by omnivorous on Jan 18, 2015 2:31:59 GMT -5
Canes are considered medical equipment, like crutches or a wheelchair. If an employee of a company makes an unwarrantable challenge for one in possession of cane, that company risks being sued, under the Americans with Disabilities Act. So, as long as one doesn't draw much attention to themselves, a cane is likely to be passed-over for further scrutiny. And then there's some real James Bond-type shit, like the Unbreakable Umbrella: real-self-defense.com/unbreakable-umbrella/Just watch the videos...
|
|
matt
New Member
Trigger Jerk
Posts: 244
|
Post by matt on Jan 18, 2015 22:34:52 GMT -5
I've only seen it on JTT. And yes, that is what I'm talking about. Looks like it might make a good bit of kit for a more PRO-ACTIVE carry, in a situation where a long rifle might get you shot at, but not being armed is a bad choice. yeah, it looks promising, but i wonder when it will be for sale. Matt does a great job in staying up on the latest gear, but sometimes i wish what he posted was listed on the manufactures website. I'll forget about something if i can't bookmark it for purchase. I wish it was posted on their website when it is news too! It drives me a little crazier everytime there is a new "release" that isn't actually available. I do think the 6 Second Mount has potential but it probably wouldn't be my choice for this conversation. It is not easily holstered/concealed and is really meant for more overt action. Night stand duty - you bet. CCW - not my first choice. I suppose it could be relegated to off-body-carry but that is less than ideal for a number of reasons. As much as the 6 Second Mount is probably best for the reliability of the optic and handgun, if you have to carry an RDS equipped handgun concealed on your body, a more compact system is preferable.
|
|
|
Post by Patriotic Sheepdog on Jan 19, 2015 19:52:45 GMT -5
Matt, thanks for the reply. I concur and was thinking the 6 second mount would be good on the G-23 thats at my bedside. For carrying, it wouldn't be practical IMO. As far as the posting on the manufacturers website, I know its not your fault. It happens way too often on many sites and it is frustrating for those of us that see something and maybe are ready to purchase. I don't always have the time to call the manufacturer and order, but if it was on the website, they may get a sale. Seems like the manufacturer would understand that when they release the details to you and other firearm blogs they would have it posted on their site. It would be one thing if they were just showing off prototypes, but when things are ready to sell, get it on the website. BTW Matt, love your blog and check it daily. For those here that don't check Matts blog, you should as he keeps us up to date on new and up and coming gear. Keep up the good work. jerkingthetrigger.com
|
|
|
Post by Diz on Jan 23, 2015 16:36:07 GMT -5
Here is something else for your consideration. Some guys just build (or have built) a prototype and then go out and try to drum up some industry buzz, via JTT and others. They do not invest in a production run until the demand is already present, in the form of pre-orders and such. I guess the theory is they don't want to (or don't have the ability to) invest in production until there is demonstrable demand.
While I understand that approach (probably business 101), I am designing what I think is the best product for our needs, based on my, and other's experiences. This is probably ass-backwards from a marketing and business approach, but at least we can build what we put pretty pictures of on line. Not as fast as we like, but we're getting there, slow but sure.
The reason you don't see them readily available is probably funding. There are lot of good ideas out there with no funding. There are so-so products out there with massive funding. Every once in awhile there are even good products with good funding.
Kind of a tease really. You see something that makes really good sense, but then you can't get it. The unfortunate side effect is that quite often unscrupulous persons will quickly copy the original idea and have the money to flood the market with their design, while the original guy gets the big green pickle.
|
|
|
Post by omnivorous on Jan 23, 2015 18:50:49 GMT -5
I just wish those companies who only have prototypes, and are looking to drum-up funds for regular production, would be honest about what they're doing. Kind of reminds of when a company approaches the .gov with a project, and then close-up shop shortly after the check clears. With social media today, companies and their products can't rely on tactical magazine shills to promote their crap. I found the best reviews for virtually any product/service, are to be had from online sources: forums, blogs, and user submitted videos.
|
|